SFR Economics

Around 300 wells (at +/- 1600 ft) were tested and found to have sidestream flush rates averaging 75 bpd per well. The Sidestream Flush Restrictor (SFR) was implemented field-wide eliminating the necessity of
a needle valve by maintaining a steady drip, restricting fluids to roughly 10 bpd per well and also allowing for the pumping unit to be slowed down. Average savings came to 1.2 HP per well ($450 /well /yr) and
helped facilitate pumping failure reduction. Implementation of the SFR field-wide reduced electricity by 625 kilowatts (700 wells) with a 100% investment rate-of-return.

The SFR can be tested to determine the fluid rate reductions with potential savings shown in the attached chart. Additional savings from a more reliable
chemical operation and less lifting fluids is not factored into the chart, but will often be more valuable than any electricity or fuel savings.

How to test your current bpd flow rate?

Testing the needle valve and SFR arrangement requires one to disconnect the line to the annulus and timing the fluids entering a container (if safely performed). Adjustment to the flowrate may need to be
made if the casing pressure is not atmospheric.

The adjustment in rate would be roughly:
Qactual = Qtest_diff * {(WHPavg-Csg Pressavg)/ (WHPavg)}** 0.5 (square root function), where
Qtest_diff = Difference in Flush Rates tested into a container at atmospheric pressure
WHPavg = Average wellhead pressure at pump tee Csg Pressavg = Average Casing Annulus Pressure

EXAMPLE: A well with a needle valve sidestream installation was tested and yielded a rate of 85 BPD (Barrels per Day) with an average wellhead pressure of 110 psi and a casing pressure of 80 psi. A SFR
was installed and the flush was tested at 10 BPD. The pumping fluid level is around 5000 feet.
Using the equation above, the Qactual would be +/- 40 bpd = 75 bpd * {(110-80)/110}**0.5 = 75*0.52 Using the chart above, the electricity savings would be around 2.4 Horsepower and $1000/yr/well.